More Crap !!!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think Mo is the sharpest bulb. He needs Nebraska football more than it needs him. JMO :wave2:

I don't want to label anyone but damn man... You dun f**ked up!


Ok so maybe we need to have a box we can put all these players and coaches in that will reprogram there brains cause this getting out of hand. They are either doing this kinda Baby Poop or beating them or looking the other way while others are. Or have roid rage. This post sounds socialist so yeah but anyway.

Who is hoping baseball season is calm cool and collected this year??
 
I’m a little late to the party, and I did read many but not all of the posts. That said, Uenth...you are a warrior. Thanks for sharing insight that most penis-havers (including me) just can’t seem to see for themselves. And you stayed on point when the conversation, as it ALWAYS seems to, went from talking about the person with the legal troubles (Mo) to “well let’s not forget that that girl was being a slut” (paraphrasing). Even after Chris clarified what Mo was accused of, it still devolved to damning that woman (a kid at the time) and her behavior.

I’m in my mid 40s with two teenage boys. I’m petrified for them. Not because I fear that they will be falsely accused, but because it’s easy to do something that can forever stain their lives. But I don’t have fear that they will be gang raped and then have videos of it floating around on the internet. For those of you with daughters, I hope you never need Revenge Porn laws to come to your aid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uenth
Lol, our 7 pages pales to the sites that have over 1,000 comments.

Part of the situation here is that this is a relatively new law (5 years old) that contains the following criteria: "You know or should know that the distribution of the image will cause the person serious emotional distress". This isn't a comment on MW's particular case, but how easy is it for any of us to unknowingly commit a crime and we don't even know a law against it exists? And then simply because we should know we get in trouble with the law when any/all of us would simply have said "well had you told me I wouldn't have". Plenty of area where we know we're possibly bending a rule but not knowing the extent we could get in trouble. That's why I'm going to really ram this stuff home when my boys are old enough to want/get a phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ramelbm and Uenth
I’m a little late to the party, and I did read many but not all of the posts. That said, Uenth...you are a warrior. Thanks for sharing insight that most penis-havers (including me) just can’t seem to see for themselves. And you stayed on point when the conversation, as it ALWAYS seems to, went from talking about the person with the legal troubles (Mo) to “well let’s not forget that that girl was being a slut” (paraphrasing). Even after Chris clarified what Mo was accused of, it still devolved to damning that woman (a kid at the time) and her behavior.

I’m in my mid 40s with two teenage boys. I’m petrified for them. Not because I fear that they will be falsely accused, but because it’s easy to do something that can forever stain their lives. But I don’t have fear that they will be gang raped and then have videos of it floating around on the internet. For those of you with daughters, I hope you never need Revenge Porn laws to come to your aid.
Thanks so much for your kind words. I also have my own experiences to fall back on. Was not assaulted but put in a real bad position Senior year in HS. Thought I was going to get my throat slit. Dirt bag did me a favor as it made me acutely aware of potential situations throughout my dating years and I was always very careful to keep myself out of bad situations (like leaving a bar with someone who had bought me a few drinks, etc). But, a Hell of a way to learn a lesson.
 
I have 2 teenage girls...1 at UNL. I’m watching this close...I know my girls and they aren’t angels but my 16 y/o no longer has a boyfriend because of a video....wasn’t close to this degree but enough for me to step in as a Dad and shut their lives down. My frustration is the single Mother of the young man who thinks I went too far. I told her...Well you can’t control that can you? I think parents let stuff go on too long then intervene when it’s too late. Young man tried to come explain himself and I said by...You struck out with me...Get lost. Just being a Dad with girls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ramelbm and Uenth
I have 2 teenage girls...1 at UNL. I’m watching this close...I know my girls and they aren’t angels but my 16 y/o no longer has a boyfriend because of a video....wasn’t close to this degree but enough for me to step in as a Dad and shut their lives down. My frustration is the single Mother of the young man who thinks I went too far. I told her...Well you can’t control that can you? I think parents let stuff go on too long then intervene when it’s too late. Young man tried to come explain himself and I said by...You struck out with me...Get lost. Just being a Dad with girls.
The difference between raising boys versus girls is just astronomical. I don't think parents of boys understand what all raising a girl entails. I think you've done the right thing by shutting down a bad situation with your 16 year old. Some day she will thank you for this!
 
I assume he's talking from a PR standpoint. Agree the transgressions do not compare. If I had to pick an outcome on the limited info we have, mine is that he is still on the team next year. I don't agree with the people who assume he is automatically gone, especially if it goes down to a misdemeanor.

You assume correctly.
 
I have 2 teenage girls...1 at UNL. I’m watching this close...I know my girls and they aren’t angels but my 16 y/o no longer has a boyfriend because of a video....wasn’t close to this degree but enough for me to step in as a Dad and shut their lives down. My frustration is the single Mother of the young man who thinks I went too far. I told her...Well you can’t control that can you? I think parents let stuff go on too long then intervene when it’s too late. Young man tried to come explain himself and I said by...You struck out with me...Get lost. Just being a Dad with girls.
Sounds like a wise Dad who took action for the well being of his daughter. I salute you, sir! I have 3 daughters, one is a Soph in College near Tampa, FL, one is Senior in HS and one a Soph in high school. I have had similar talks with my girls over the years, making it clear that I will step in in any relationship that goes too far. My youngest daughter had a young man sending profane sexual suggestions over Snapchat, so I had to contact his Dad and have "that" talk. Social media may help connect youngsters, but it really has some pitfalls that require parents to stay on their toes these days....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: NebSailor and Uenth
Some here are getting confused about what he charged with.

He's being charged with felony for possession of child pornography, not for anything related to participating/being present at an alleged assault.
He's being charged with "sharing said material without the person’s permission and with the potential to cause emotional distress." That charge is a misdemeanor.

OK do you know something we don't? Has he been arraigned? My internet has been down for two days so IM behind the curve. So far I haven't heard of charges that are filed. Second, Bill Moos seems to be supporting the kid, so all those leading a charge to dismiss the kid are likely to be disappointed. If a charge of possession is made, its for one purpose that is to force Mo to plead to the misdemeanor charge. That is how the finest legal system in the world works. ( If this vid was put on the internet, then the DA can probably charge 1000 s for possession of porn because that is how social media works)

I will go back to what I said in day one of this witch hunt, Mo is guilty of being stupid, but what young kid is not stupid? Is it a crime? Mo needs a good lawyer, I hope that guy in Lincoln is good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cigarman
MORE

Officials are still working out logistics for a Nebraska running back to return to California to face two charges accusing him of sending a sex video to an ex-girlfriend.

Maurice Washington, 19, is accused of texting a video of an alleged sexual assault from 2016 of a former girlfriend to the same girl two years later, after his sexual advances were denied.

Authorities are not alleging that Washington is in the video or recorded the video.

The Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office has filed two charges against Washington but is waiting for a judge to sign a warrant, which had been given to the judge in mid-December.

The charges accuse Washington of possessing a video involving a child engaging in or simulating sexual conduct, a felony, and sharing that video without the person’s permission and with the potential to cause emotional distress, a misdemeanor.

Clarissa Hamilton, the supervisor of the sexual assault unit in the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office, said that once the judge approves the warrant, Washington could be extradited to California or return voluntarily. She hopes the judge will sign the warrant soon.

“Cases are fluid and we are always ready and willing to look at any evidence the defendant may wish to share,” she said in an email.


John Ball, a Lincoln attorney representing Washington, said his client will have to return to California at some point. He said the arrangements for Washington to go are still being figured out.

He declined to go into detail about the next steps in the case, other than to say that a jury trial or a plea agreement are both possibilities.

If convicted, Washington could face up to a year in jail, Hamilton said, although other punishments avoiding jail are possible.

Ball on Monday said Washington has confidence in due process and the presumption of innocence.

“The communications between these two young people are yet to be fully determined, and there are additional facts and circumstances that give context and perspective to this situation,” Ball has said.

A search warrant affidavit obtained by The World-Herald detailed Washington’s communications with the girl before he sent her the explicit video.

Washington and the girl had dated in eighth and ninth grades, but had begun speaking again in 2018 on Instagram after the girl, then 17, congratulated him about going to Nebraska to play football.

The conversations turned sexual, the affidavit said, and Washington made sexual advances toward the girl. When she told him she wasn’t interested in a romantic relationship with him, he became “increasingly aggressive in his communication,” the affidavit said, and became “angry and mean.”

The girl blocked him on Instagram.

On March 2, about 8:43 a.m., the girl received a text message from Washington from a number that was later found to be registered to Washington’s adoptive father, the document says.

The text contained a 10-second video of a girl performing oral sex on one teen in the back seat of a vehicle, with another teen masturbating while watching her naked behind.

“Remember this hoe,” the text from Washington said, according to the affidavit.

The girl’s mother was able to see all of her daughter’s texts through an iPad, and she immediately told the girl not to look at the video because she believed it was a video of the alleged 2016 sexual assault.

About six hours later, the girl wrote back to Washington: “Send me that again I didn’t see it. Maurice?”

Washington replied, “Send you what”

The girl said, “That video”

He said, “You seen it”

She responded: “I Didn’t tho”

He said: “Oh I didn’t send nun”


A deputy with the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office requested cellphone records from Apple Inc. on March 19 after speaking with the girl’s mother and viewing the video and texts.

The Nebraska athletic department said in a statement Monday that it had been contacted by the Nebraska Attorney General’s Office and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Police Department regarding the investigation.

“Last fall we were ... made aware that officials in California were interested in interviewing Maurice Washington about a prior incident,” the athletic department statement read. “Details were not shared and there was no additional follow-up with the Nebraska Athletic Department. Recently, we were made aware that charges may be filed against Maurice in California. We have not had a chance to review the charges, and will continue to monitor this ongoing legal process.”

Athletic Director Bill Moos said Tuesday during a radio interview that Nebraska was “inquisitive” upon learning of the situation involving Washington but “there wasn’t a lot of conversation that went any further than, ‘We have a concern and something happened in California and we’ll keep you informed.’ That’s how it panned out.”

Moos said Washington is “cooperating” with authorities in California.

“Obviously we’re looking into it every way we can, but it’s a legal matter,” Moos said. “We want to make sure Maurice is cooperating — which he is. We also want to make sure he knows he has a great deal of support. And then really the legal authorities and the whole system kind of guides it from here on out.”

Suzanne Gage, spokeswoman for the Nebraska Attorney General’s Office, said Tuesday that the office was contacted in August by the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office seeking information about Washington.

An Attorney General’s Office investigator contacted the University of Nebraska — Gage didn’t specify who at NU was called — then received contact information for Washington and made multiple phone calls to him, Gage said.

A university spokeswoman said the Attorney General’s Office called UNL police “requesting a point of contact for Athletics to contact a football player.”

“The contact information for Athletics and the Attorney General’s Office were provided to each,” the spokeswoman said. “The nature of the inquiry was not known at that time.”

Sometime in mid-September, the attorney’s general’s investigator received a call from Jon Bruning, a former Nebraska attorney general. Bruning at the time told the investigator that he represented Washington and that Washington declined to comment.

Bruning could not be reached for comment Tuesday night.

The Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office released a statement Tuesday saying that if Washington is guilty, “it is deeply disturbing and he should be held accountable.

“Our community’s youth must understand the profound (effect) and trauma associated with leveraging potentially embarrassing content from social media outlets to intimidate, bully and hurt others,” Sheriff Laurie Smith said.
 
Some fathers wink at their sons with their gfs.
Afriend of mine did that with my oldest, I told him dont do that, its not cool to do that.
He has younger boy and girl, I asked him if thats what he planned for his boy, he said yeah, its the manly thing to do?
So then I said,as I too have a daughter, is that how its going to go with your daughter, he said, heck no, are you crazy?
I said, are you?
Hows that supposed to work?
Comes down to respect.
 
MORE

Officials are still working out logistics for a Nebraska running back to return to California to face two charges accusing him of sending a sex video to an ex-girlfriend.

Maurice Washington, 19, is accused of texting a video of an alleged sexual assault from 2016 of a former girlfriend to the same girl two years later, after his sexual advances were denied.

Authorities are not alleging that Washington is in the video or recorded the video.

The Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office has filed two charges against Washington but is waiting for a judge to sign a warrant, which had been given to the judge in mid-December.

The charges accuse Washington of possessing a video involving a child engaging in or simulating sexual conduct, a felony, and sharing that video without the person’s permission and with the potential to cause emotional distress, a misdemeanor.

Clarissa Hamilton, the supervisor of the sexual assault unit in the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office, said that once the judge approves the warrant, Washington could be extradited to California or return voluntarily. She hopes the judge will sign the warrant soon.

“Cases are fluid and we are always ready and willing to look at any evidence the defendant may wish to share,” she said in an email.


John Ball, a Lincoln attorney representing Washington, said his client will have to return to California at some point. He said the arrangements for Washington to go are still being figured out.

He declined to go into detail about the next steps in the case, other than to say that a jury trial or a plea agreement are both possibilities.

If convicted, Washington could face up to a year in jail, Hamilton said, although other punishments avoiding jail are possible.

Ball on Monday said Washington has confidence in due process and the presumption of innocence.

“The communications between these two young people are yet to be fully determined, and there are additional facts and circumstances that give context and perspective to this situation,” Ball has said.

A search warrant affidavit obtained by The World-Herald detailed Washington’s communications with the girl before he sent her the explicit video.

Washington and the girl had dated in eighth and ninth grades, but had begun speaking again in 2018 on Instagram after the girl, then 17, congratulated him about going to Nebraska to play football.

The conversations turned sexual, the affidavit said, and Washington made sexual advances toward the girl. When she told him she wasn’t interested in a romantic relationship with him, he became “increasingly aggressive in his communication,” the affidavit said, and became “angry and mean.”

The girl blocked him on Instagram.

On March 2, about 8:43 a.m., the girl received a text message from Washington from a number that was later found to be registered to Washington’s adoptive father, the document says.

The text contained a 10-second video of a girl performing oral sex on one teen in the back seat of a vehicle, with another teen masturbating while watching her naked behind.

“Remember this hoe,” the text from Washington said, according to the affidavit.

The girl’s mother was able to see all of her daughter’s texts through an iPad, and she immediately told the girl not to look at the video because she believed it was a video of the alleged 2016 sexual assault.

About six hours later, the girl wrote back to Washington: “Send me that again I didn’t see it. Maurice?”

Washington replied, “Send you what”

The girl said, “That video”

He said, “You seen it”

She responded: “I Didn’t tho”

He said: “Oh I didn’t send nun”


A deputy with the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office requested cellphone records from Apple Inc. on March 19 after speaking with the girl’s mother and viewing the video and texts.

The Nebraska athletic department said in a statement Monday that it had been contacted by the Nebraska Attorney General’s Office and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Police Department regarding the investigation.

“Last fall we were ... made aware that officials in California were interested in interviewing Maurice Washington about a prior incident,” the athletic department statement read. “Details were not shared and there was no additional follow-up with the Nebraska Athletic Department. Recently, we were made aware that charges may be filed against Maurice in California. We have not had a chance to review the charges, and will continue to monitor this ongoing legal process.”

Athletic Director Bill Moos said Tuesday during a radio interview that Nebraska was “inquisitive” upon learning of the situation involving Washington but “there wasn’t a lot of conversation that went any further than, ‘We have a concern and something happened in California and we’ll keep you informed.’ That’s how it panned out.”

Moos said Washington is “cooperating” with authorities in California.

“Obviously we’re looking into it every way we can, but it’s a legal matter,” Moos said. “We want to make sure Maurice is cooperating — which he is. We also want to make sure he knows he has a great deal of support. And then really the legal authorities and the whole system kind of guides it from here on out.”

Suzanne Gage, spokeswoman for the Nebraska Attorney General’s Office, said Tuesday that the office was contacted in August by the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office seeking information about Washington.

An Attorney General’s Office investigator contacted the University of Nebraska — Gage didn’t specify who at NU was called — then received contact information for Washington and made multiple phone calls to him, Gage said.

A university spokeswoman said the Attorney General’s Office called UNL police “requesting a point of contact for Athletics to contact a football player.”

“The contact information for Athletics and the Attorney General’s Office were provided to each,” the spokeswoman said. “The nature of the inquiry was not known at that time.”

Sometime in mid-September, the attorney’s general’s investigator received a call from Jon Bruning, a former Nebraska attorney general. Bruning at the time told the investigator that he represented Washington and that Washington declined to comment.

Bruning could not be reached for comment Tuesday night.

The Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office released a statement Tuesday saying that if Washington is guilty, “it is deeply disturbing and he should be held accountable.

“Our community’s youth must understand the profound (effect) and trauma associated with leveraging potentially embarrassing content from social media outlets to intimidate, bully and hurt others,” Sheriff Laurie Smith said.
I think the school should send the mom a copy, its so important.
I sincerly hope none of these people work at a nuke facility.
 
The text back to "Maurice" looks like a bait to me (having tried once to get a tenant to confirm he got my letter) to lock him in to being culpable. Our law system is a wicked web. Does the vague allusion then denial (guess he caught on) stick?
 
There's a pretty huge elephant in this room that no one has mentioned. I thought I would let someone else bring it up yesterday. No one did, so here goes:

Husker RB Maurice Washington faces child porn charges in California after sending video of ex-girlfriend

Skip to the end of the article where his high school playing time is discussed. His Senior Year, Mo played in Dallas, not California where he attended through Junior Year. Expelled from Trinity Christian because of unspecified behavior problems. I would love to know what they were.

Since Taylor was pretty much dragged through the mud without any evidence, just because it looks like she "pulled a train". Mo was expelled but no one is questioning why. I'm curious, just saying. No matter what happens, the egg will be on the Huskers faces on this one and I pray to God that, if Mo stays on the team, this doesn't come back around to bite Frost in the azz.
 
Guys, and probably some gals too, have hidden cameras set up in their bedrooms or just have their cell phones recording "the heat of the moment" as it were. Some post the videos as an act of revenge if the relationship goes sour and some just post it because they are jack wagons. !
It does happen quite a bit. And I agree with the law. However there has to be a certain amount of context put into it. Most of those cases that are on the extreme side and based on the jilted person posting the picture to social media or a paid web site for compensation. The whole intent is to embarrass her to the masses. In my opinion the law needs to distinguish the difference between the two especially when the same video had already been released publicly by another individual. They are saying it came from someone else's phone but if I had to guess probably at his urging. The fact that it only went directly to her...…..is in my mind a lesser degree of harm than what the original guy did.
 
There's a pretty huge elephant in this room that no one has mentioned. I thought I would let someone else bring it up yesterday. No one did, so here goes:

Husker RB Maurice Washington faces child porn charges in California after sending video of ex-girlfriend

Skip to the end of the article where his high school playing time is discussed. His Senior Year, Mo played in Dallas, not California where he attended through Junior Year. Expelled from Trinity Christian because of unspecified behavior problems. I would love to know what they were.

Since Taylor was pretty much dragged through the mud without any evidence, just because it looks like she "pulled a train". Mo was expelled but no one is questioning why. I'm curious, just saying. No matter what happens, the egg will be on the Huskers faces on this one and I pray to God that, if Mo stays on the team, this doesn't come back around to bite Frost in the azz.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
BHF 25 Anniversary Poster

Latest posts

Members online