Did the clock run out before the ball it the ground out-of-bounds? No.
But on the other hand, have I ever seen an out-of-bounds pass play in any CFB game where a second was put back on the clock afterwards? No.
Here is the deal. When you see the replay indeed there is a split second between the ball hitting the post and the clock hitting zero. BUT (big but) the timekeeper's reaction in live action couldn't stop the clock at that exact moment due to the human element. Thing is, that is to be expected because it takes the same amount of time for him to react to the ball being snapped. Therefore, the playclock and live time was correct. Putting time back on the clock was a confiscation of the spirit of the rule. If you believe that the clock should stop at minus the human element then we would have needed to go back and add roughly 120 seconds to the clock to account for every play prior to that.
Of course they didn't do that. They singled out the final and most critical play that gave one team a distinct and jaw dropping advantage.
What if, Nebraska or Texas was ahead by 10 points at that time? Would the officials ran up and held multiple conferences and illogical arguments to run one more play?
This was a manipulative and purposeful bending of the rules. Just as it appeared to be.
