Completely good with Thompson or Purdy--as long as they have to compete with the QBs currently on the roster--no preordained starter ala Callahan/Keller
GBR
Completely good with Thompson or Purdy--as long as they have to compete with the QBs currently on the roster--no preordained starter ala Callahan/Keller
Good luck with that. I have a hard time believing we get any transfer portal QB who hasn't gotten some assurance he's gonna be the starter.Completely good with Thompson or Purdy--as long as they have to compete with the QBs currently on the roster--no preordained starter ala Callahan/Keller
Same here Red. If Thompson is the answer Frost has no idea what the question is.I'm torn on this one. Between giving myself a lobotomy with a spoon, and tearing out my guts with a fork.
Texas, considering the softness of the BiG XII, basically was Nebraska South this past year.
Hard to believe AM2 was threatened by the two QBs behind him— LS8 looked fairly pedestrian in the limited time we saw him and unless HH is the second coming of Tom Brady, I just don’t see itGood luck with that. I have a hard time believing we get any transfer portal QB who hasn't gotten some assurance he's gonna be the starter.
Heck, from what I heard, that's ultimately the reason why AM2 decided to leave.
MisCom here RSR. I think DrF is saying 2AM knew Frost was going to be looking in the portal for a replacement next year.Hard to believe AM2 was threatened by the two QBs behind him— LS8 looked fairly pedestrian in the limited time we saw him and unless HH is the second coming of Tom Brady, I just don’t see it
GBR
Dunno, neither option presented gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling. I think I'll pass on your options; guess that means I'm thinking we should pass on either portal QB possibility.I'm torn on this one. Between giving myself a lobotomy with a spoon, and tearing out my guts with a fork.
That makes more sense, but I would think it would be difficult to recruit a quality QB when you have a 4-year starter on campus— unless you guaranteed him a starting spotMisCom here RSR. I think DrF is saying 2AM knew Frost was going to be looking in the portal for a replacement next year.
Yeah, that's what's been floating through my mind as well. I think a tangled web may be woven here.That makes more sense, but I would think it would be difficult to recruit a quality QB when you have a 4-year starter on campus— unless you guaranteed him a starting spot
GBR
Kind of one of those 'Deals with the Devil' things because if your QB portal guy doesn't deliver in practice and your head coach actually does the right thing and benches him, you've hindered your chances of landing another hotshot QB portal transfer down the road.I think a tangled web may be woven here.
Best we've had was Gdowski in 1989, 19 Td's, 2 INT's.Whoops. Missed one. Zac Taylor had a 26-8 ratio so he is the exception. However that puts Thompson in the Taylor-Ganz realm. Not a bad place to be.
Eye openming stats. I knew we were bad, but didn't realize we were that bad.Funny you ask I was just looking up turnover ratio. Here is our ranking going backwards in time to Solich's final year.
Frost
103
122
55
87
Riley
101
36
114
Pelini
73
118
108
54
54
33
110
Callahan
117
69
52
108
Solich
2 (yes two!)
As you can see we are dead dog awful irregardless of the coach. We've poked up to average a few years and those usually conjoined with better records. The best season record, not coincidently, was Solich's final year and our highest ranking by far.
The next best, 36, was the year Riley won nine games, the best record by a mile since Pelini. Of the 19 years tracked we've finished in the bottom pit (100+) an astounding 9 times.
There is an obvious correlation here. You take care of the ball, you win games.
We absolutely have to escape from this. This year is the golden example. We have a pretty decent defense, we move the ball well, but the turnover ratio just doesn't allow you to win games. Throw a ridiculous special teams factor in there and you win one P5 game. Look at the Iowa game. It all just screams at you.
How do you sign HS QB's if they see other QB's recruited out of HS riding the pine while a portal QB transfers in and gets 99.99% of the playing time? I would think that eventually this would bite a HC in the ass (maybe sooner rather than later).Kind of one of those 'Deals with the Devil' things because if your QB portal guy doesn't deliver in practice and your head coach actually does the right thing and benches him, you've hindered your chances of landing another hotshot QB portal transfer down the road.
If you keep the competition honest, most players are satisfied. If you grade them fairly in practice and let them win or lose their position on the roster, most players won't gripe. However, if you predetermine starters and the rest is just for show the players know and will take sides. That is how you lose a team.How do you sign HS QB's if they see other QB's recruited out of HS riding the pine while a portal QB transfers in and gets 99.99% of the playing time? I would think that eventually this would bite a HC in the ass (maybe sooner rather than later).
Yeah, losing a team was what I was alluding to.If you keep the competition honest, most players are satisfied. If you grade them fairly in practice and let them win or lose their position on the roster, most players won't gripe. However, if you predetermine starters and the rest is just for show the players know and will take sides. That is how you lose a team.