This was pretty much the only side effect of the vaccine I had. Lymph nodes in my arm pit swelled up a little. Otherwise head just felt a little like a hangover. Not even bad enough to take tylenol though. I never got tested so don't know if I've had covid or not. Never felt sick anyway
Yea, it doesnt matter how sick you got.This was pretty much the only side effect of the vaccine I had. Lymph nodes in my arm pit swelled up a little. Otherwise head just felt a little like a hangover. Not even bad enough to take tylenol though. I never got tested so don't know if I've had covid or not. Never felt sick anyway
We'll never know how many folks had COVID-19 because we just didn't do enough testing. After hub tested positive, I called to get my appointment for testing and the nurse told me that "We don't generally test spouses and just assume they have it." I told her that I don't like assumptions and that if I have COVID-19, I should be included in the statistics and assumptions are not counted. She sighed and gave me an appointment and I did test positive. Being asymptomatic, I was surprised but not shocked.Yea, it doesnt matter how sick you got.
I think of it like, both you and your spouse gets the same bug, but one of you gets hit a lot harder than the other, and you may not even notice it, unless you see your spouse and their symptoms.
Theres no guarantee you had it, but it is likely.
More asymptomatic people out there than we'll ever know, and they really did little to check, because the virus is tougher to show in them first off, but the antibodies just werent checked in people.
No, testing does NO good once the virus is gone.We'll never know how many folks had COVID-19 because we just didn't do enough testing. After hub tested positive, I called to get my appointment for testing and the nurse told me that "We don't generally test spouses and just assume they have it." I told her that I don't like assumptions and that if I have COVID-19, I should be included in the statistics and assumptions are not counted. She sighed and gave me an appointment and I did test positive. Being asymptomatic, I was surprised but not shocked.
There was a time that testing asymptomatic people made sense, because it helped track the virus and gather information about how transmissable it is. By summer, that should have ended. Now we will never know the CFR and IFR for this virus because they are all lumped together.No, testing does NO good once the virus is gone.
The test will always come up negative.
We didnt do the right testing.
If you had waited a few weeks or maybe less, your test would have been negative.
If you showed no signs you didnt get tested, and in your case, it was rare, as the nurse said, they dont test asymptomatic people.
Youd have needed a blood test for the antibodies, and not the virus, which they did hardly any of.
I blew a gasket when this was the decision theyd made, and even early on,when they were doing such testing, the 'experts'said,because it wasnt a 'random, double blind' test, we couldnt get the at least fuzzy picture to guesstimate the approximate asymptomatic numbers, and EVERY 'expert' that was 'chosen' came against this.
It would have caused more problems for THEM, as they had declared asymtomatic infections to be the MAIN culprit in infections at the time, which we have since, and some knew then, as did I, that the asmptomatic were NOT that infectious, but the chosen 'experts' had made that claim
asymptonmatic is a jokeThere was a time that testing asymptomatic people made sense, because it helped track the virus and gather information about how transmissable it is. By summer, that should have ended. Now we will never know the CFR and IFR for this virus because they are all lumped together.
Lumping CFR and IFR amounts to CYAThere was a time that testing asymptomatic people made sense, because it helped track the virus and gather information about how transmissable it is. By summer, that should have ended. Now we will never know the CFR and IFR for this virus because they are all lumped together.
I'm sorry you are saying you had covid and still got the jab? Why?We'll never know how many folks had COVID-19 because we just didn't do enough testing. After hub tested positive, I called to get my appointment for testing and the nurse told me that "We don't generally test spouses and just assume they have it." I told her that I don't like assumptions and that if I have COVID-19, I should be included in the statistics and assumptions are not counted. She sighed and gave me an appointment and I did test positive. Being asymptomatic, I was surprised but not shocked.
That's not what I'm saying at all. We didn't do enough timely testing, period. To tell people, just assume you are positive was just wrong. Your spouse or kid or whatever tested positive, test the entire family and know who had what.No, testing does NO good once the virus is gone.
The test will always come up negative.
We didnt do the right testing.
If you had waited a few weeks or maybe less, your test would have been negative.
If you showed no signs you didnt get tested, and in your case, it was rare, as the nurse said, they dont test asymptomatic people.
Youd have needed a blood test for the antibodies, and not the virus, which they did hardly any of.
I blew a gasket when this was the decision theyd made, and even early on,when they were doing such testing, the 'experts'said,because it wasnt a 'random, double blind' test, we couldnt get the at least fuzzy picture to guesstimate the approximate asymptomatic numbers, and EVERY 'expert' that was 'chosen' came against this.
It would have caused more problems for THEM, as they had declared asymtomatic infections to be the MAIN culprit in infections at the time, which we have since, and some knew then, as did I, that the asmptomatic were NOT that infectious, but the chosen 'experts' had made that claim
Umm, actually it was 2 jabs.I'm sorry you are saying you had covid and still got the jab? Why?
Saw a graphic where the spanish flu was almost 3 times as deadlySome have certainly been far worse on a lethal scale. But they also tended to strike during global cooling events, when resources were already thin.