Well, duh. Of course they are legit.This guy seems to think so
Schools like Texas claim Natties that were awarded BEFORE the bowl games (uh, that they subsequently lost.)Imo the only one that might be suspect is 1970, but all of them are more legit than many of the others various schools claim.
Yeah, no way should we have been splitting the title with MeCHICKEN. That was a travesty.Schools like Texas claim Natties that were awarded BEFORE the bowl games (uh, that they subsequently lost.)
Other school like Michigan claim a bunch of non-existent natties from the early days. Those are the 'eyebrow raising' ones.
Without looking at the click-bait video, NONE of Nebraska's were questionable. The only question mark is why AP writers gave half of one to a Michigan team Nebraska would have dominated.
Schools like Texas claim Natties that were awarded BEFORE the bowl games (uh, that they subsequently lost.)
Other school like Michigan claim a bunch of non-existent natties from the early days. Those are the 'eyebrow raising' ones.
Without looking at the click-bait video, NONE of Nebraska's were questionable. The only question mark is why AP writers gave half of one to a Michigan team Nebraska would have dominated.
I agree it was just nice hearing it from a outside source he wasn't even a fan of Nebraska coming to his own conclusion. Piecing it all together on unbiased dataWell, duh. Of course they are legit.
Slow off-season sounds about right. But on the bright side, only 160 days until opening game.I have heard of "slow off-season" before, but this thread is an all new low. LOL