Riley, by the numbers....

Big Red Emperor

Redshirt
Jun 25, 2017
104
10
18
47
P5 Coaches hired in 2005:

Winning Pct
1. Paul Chryst, 30-6 (19-4) .833, +.150 over prev 3 yrs
2. Jim Harbaugh, 27-8 (17-6) .771, +.245 over prev 3 yrs
3. Jim McElwain, 22-12 (16-8) .647, +.052 over prev 3 yrs
4. Pat Narduzzi, 20-15 (13-8) .571, +.084 over prev 3yrs
5. Mike Riley, 19-15 (12-10) .559, -.141 over prev 3 yrs
6. Gary Anderson, 7-23 (3-18) .233, -.319 over prev 3 yrs
7. David Beaty, 3-30 (1-23) .091, -.104 over prev 3 yrs

Top 25 Finishes (prev 3 yrs)
1. Paul Chryst, 3 (2)
2. Jim Harbaugh, 2 (1); Jim McElwain, 2 (1); Pat Narduzzi, 2 (0)
5. Mike Riley, 0 (2); Gary Anderson, 0 (1); David Beaty, 0 (0)

Recruiting - Avg. Star Rating (prev 3 yrs +/-)
1. Jim Harbaugh, 3.52 (-.02)
2. Jim McElwain, 3.42 (-.20)
3. Mike Riley, 3.19 (+.09)
4. Paul Chryst, 3.05 (+.12)
5. Pat Narduzzi, 2.98 (-.01)
6. Gary Anderson, 2.82 (-.26)
7. David Beaty, 2.74 (-.26)

Mike Riley at Nebraska:
19-15 overall, 12-8 at home, 7-7 on the road
12-10 in B1G, 7-9 in B1G West

Trailed at the half 20 of 34 games at NU, 6-14 when trailing at the half. (1-5 in '15, 4-4 '16, 1-5 '17)

Like it or not Tommy's legs covered up problems on OL, won us some games we shouldn't have won last year. But Tommy was the problem they said... Riley trailed a the half in 8 games in '16.

Trailed at the half the last 4 games, 6 of the last 8, 14 of the last 20.

Mike has been outscored 87-48 in Q1 '17, he's dominated Q3, but poor starts (or poor gameplans/scripting) have cost him big time this year.

8 times he's had back-to-back losses at NU. (Solich 3, Callahan 5, Pelini 5)
Riley has had 1 stretch of 3+ wins in a row. (Solich 7, Callahan 5, Pelini 13)

NU is 6-9 in the last 15. Needed last play prayers to beat both Ark St & Purdue in 2 of those W's. Easily could be/probably should be 4-11 in last 15. It's a game of results, Mike's struggled to get them. Mike is not even his normal .500 self as of late.

NU has lost 5 home games in a season 3 times... 1947, 1951, 1957. If NU loses to Iowa, Riley will join that dubious list even Callahan failed to join. It will also be the 1st time in school history we've lost 4 conference games at home, and 4 straight conference games at home. Maybe Mike really is a record-breaking coach? Who knew...

Yet some still think Mike just needs more time.
 
If he (most likely) goes after this season, I'll be disappointed to have to play what might have been. I didn't like the hire in the first place, but I was intrigued by the question of 'what could he do with more talent?'. If he could have truly gotten his culture and players in place, could he have made some noise? However, after watching that train wreck of a screen play in overtime, not only does Mike not have the talent he wants, I don't think he has the playbook he needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: justino52
de ja vu?

Riley's 35 career games at NU: 19-16
Callahan's last 35 games that got him the axe: 19-16

Vegas gives NU a 40.2% chance to beat Minny, 3.6% chance to beat PSU, 26.1% chance to beat Iowa.

Can Mike even finish his NU career w/ 20 W's? If Mike loses out, he'll join some dubious company that makes Callahan look like a legend... NU has only had 2 coaches in it's history finish w/ .500 or below win% (coached at least 3 seasons):

Bill Jennings 1957-61, 15-34-1 .310
Bill Glassford 1949-55, 31-35-3 .471
 
Care to elaborate, I'm not picking up what you're putting down?
Sure. 62.5% of my comments are tongue in cheek, this one included. A plethora of negative data to suggest Mike Riley is not getting it done at NU, and I cherry picked the one positive... huskers have outscored their opponents in the 3rd Q... So I gave the poor guy credit for "halftime adjustments"
What's the point of piling on?
 
Sure. 62.5% of my comments are tongue in cheek, this one included. A plethora of negative data to suggest Mike Riley is not getting it done at NU, and I cherry picked the one positive... huskers have outscored their opponents in the 3rd Q... So I gave the poor guy credit for "halftime adjustments"
What's the point of piling on?

Gotcha.

Makes sense, actually.
 
Sure. 62.5% of my comments are tongue in cheek, this one included. A plethora of negative data to suggest Mike Riley is not getting it done at NU, and I cherry picked the one positive... huskers have outscored their opponents in the 3rd Q... So I gave the poor guy credit for "halftime adjustments"
What's the point of piling on?

There’s positive data somewhere? Only positive I was able to find was I’m positive it’s time to turn the page...