I really like HCMRh but my first eyebrow went up when he retained OL Coach Raiola. Now having seen his #1 choice to lead the Huskers at QB the last two games my second eyebrow is up. These two decisions are going to be the downfall of the Huskers this year and possibly next.
Aside from his lack of ball handling skills and ball protection awareness he guy needs help.
Our WR room is weak, most likely bottom tier across college football.
No threat of speed, no ability to create space, easily jammed up or stopped mid route and not the best at catching the ball. When your WR room has a walk on as a starter that runs crisp routes that should give you a hint how bad it is!
I think NC in Posts #4 and #20 and Valiant in Post #12 answer your question.As I stated, I was looking for particular information about Sims and how/why he got here, not a re-hash of how bad he is and what our problems are. So did Casey leave after Sims got here and it was fairly obvious that he was gonna be the starter, or was Casey gonna leave anyway and we had to get somebody so Sims.seemed like the best available option?
How can that be, everyone said he was out of football.....Didn't matter. He likes Tom Herman so much, he was willing to go to a group of 5 team to play for him.

Agreed. The right side of the Oline is stout. The left side needs help but they have played better in 2 games this year than at any point last year. I wish Casey hadn't left. This is the worst I've ever seen since at least Jamal Lord and maybe ever than that os Simms. I know we can't tell.much about Haarberg but when he was in I didn't see near the probs I see with Simms.I think the line is better this year, not great just better but qb is just the absolute worst I have ever witnessed at nebraska
Agreed. The issue today wasn't a coaching problem (outside of letting a bad player continue to play) it was squarely an issue with 1 player and that's the leader of your team. And when the rest of you team sees their leader continue to make mistakes and not be pulled it's demoralizing to the rest of the team. That's when the game snow balls.Against Minnesota I questioned the play calling. Especially late in the game. I honestly didnt think todays game plan or play calling was that bad. We moved the ball pretty well but our QB cant catch a snap or throw. Why he continues to play I dont know. Why we brought him here I dont know.
And the hole Nouili and Benhart blew for him to run through was as big as I've seen in many years. The the WR takes out 2 defenders and Simms was gone.Not that we needed 19 Carries from Sims like last week, but I believe his TD run was the first designed carry finally didn’t happen until the 2nd half. More of that earlier might have opened game up for better output for RB’s. Also he looks so stiff, wooden and robotic as he hands off to RB’s.
As long as you don't drop shotgun snaps and ask the center to snap the ball after the motion man has gone by and can hand off properly and not throw an I'll advised pass I want you to suit up brother. At least we wouldn't have given up 20 points.Sims is on par with me as an NFL QB. I'm 54 with 2 replaced knees.
Just a guess but if Casey had stayed and was our starter I bet that WR room looks a crap ton better than they do currently.Aside from his lack of ball handling skills and ball protection awareness he guy needs help.
Our WR room is weak, most likely bottom tier across college football.
No threat of speed, no ability to create space, easily jammed up or stopped mid route and not the best at catching the ball. When your WR room has a walk on as a starter that runs crisp routes that should give you a hint how bad it is!
If Sims has better receivers what would the offense look like?
Would production/efficiency increase by 10%. 25%. 75%?
Just a guess but if Casey had stayed and was our starter I bet that WR room looks a crap ton better than they do currently.
Is that the same as a "s h i t load"?Crap ton... That has to be one of my favorite units of measurement, maybe even more than boat load.