For all you Satt-haters out there, this was the best possible scenario you could have hoped for.
I agree RR that the jury is still out on Coach McGuire. But I like the kid and trust Coach knew what he was doing when he hired him.I’m still uncertain about our Receivers coach. Due to injuries, poor QB play, last season was so chaotic with our passing game, you couldn’t get a real handle on how well our receivers were coached. I hope we have the right mechanic for this group.
This is why you give out one year contractsI agree RR that the jury is still out on Coach McGuire. But I like the kid and trust Coach knew what he was doing when he hired him.
Like you said, there was no way to get a true read on him given last year's chaos. It had to have been an emotionally tough season for such a young WR coach. He had to deal with A LOT in his first year. Dealing with Zavier Betts and the rash of injuries that hit his room would have tried the patience of a senior coach, let alone a rookie.
But, it could be argued, that struggling through some rough times before experiencing any bigtime success is The Best Thing that could've happened to Garrett as he continues to develop as a coach. Odds are pretty high that he's going to be a great one.
I think the standard today are for two-year contracts.This is why you give out one year contracts
I believe one year is the standardI think the standard today are for two-year contracts.
But it should be noted that Rhule signed Josh Martin to a one-year contract to coach TEs---which allowed him the flexibility to hire Glenn Thomas as Co-OC and QB Coach without it disrupting the staff too much. Martin (if he wishes) can go back to his analyst position.
As lame as Satt os anything is an improvementI like the change - I do think game management will improve simply by having another brain in the mix with a co-OC. Hopefully play calling will too (if Thomas understands what his QB and offense can actually execute - better than Satterfield did - that alone will improve the offense).
That’ll give some board members something to b!tch about


Lol yep like me. Lower Satts $1.4 million to $1 mill or lower until he proves he's earned it. Then raise him back up.That’ll give some board members something to b!tch about
![]()
I've actually heard of businesses that have done that to their employees working in underperforming stores.Lol yep like me. Lower Satts $1.4 million to $1 mill or lower until he proves he's earned it. Then raise him back up.