When it comes to OL, I tend to think star rankings are fairly pointless because it typically takes even some of the most talented players 1-2 years of physical development before they're even remotely ready to play. Which begs the question regarding Nebraska's well documented struggle along the OL, is it talent evaluation, recruitment, coaching, or all three?
Is Nebraska's evaluation process wrong? Like are we just not good enough to identify great players?
In recruiting, are we recruiting the wrong guys? Are we missing on players and having to sign the Plan B's and in some cases the Plan Cs?
Is it just bad coaching?
Or, is it a combo of all three?
Nebraska's OL under Tom Osborne was never impressive according to recruiting analysts and other "gurus." But under TO, Nebraska had a system, they knew what they wanted and were looking for, and they recruited to that. The result was, year after year, Nebraska had one of the most dominant OL in all of college football despite the lack of "stars" next to our recruits names.