Future Permanent OC Candidates

Not interested in a single name on that list and not all that interested in “explosive” plays. That’s what they tried to with Captain Air Raid.
 
Lots of different names being thrown around right now by the talking heads. When I read their bio's I sometimes wonder how important (or not) would it be for the next OC to have B1G experience in that role?

Whatcha think?
Interesting question. I think having experience in the Big would be a plus……..providing it was successful experience. However if I were to chose between two candidates, and one appeared to have better qualifications, and the other didn’t fit the bill as well but had lots of Big experience I’d go with the former.

What I don’t want a successful OC that Matt is going to mold into a style with preferences that Matt wants and expects. This guy needs to be pretty much readymade. Fine tuned maybe, but micromanaged NEVER.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc Fumble
Interesting question. I think having experience in the Big would be a plus……..providing it was successful experience. However if I were to chose between two candidates, and one appeared to have better qualifications, and the other didn’t fit the bill as well but had lots of Big experience I’d go with the former.
Before this season, I thought we'd be better off with a seasoned DC with strong B1G experience. So I was a little concerned with a highly successful DC--but one who'd done it at a lower level. Over the years, I'd seen a lot of HCs and coordinators crash and burn when they moved up to the Big Leagues, let alone the B1G.

But that's the beauty of interviews. Done well, they have the ability for a qualitied (but not necessarily a first choicer) to stand out from the crowd. Though skeptical, I came away from his first presser thinking, 'this guy feels like an up-and-comer' and 'If I was a star player, he's the kind of coach I'd want to play for.'
What I don’t want a successful OC that Matt is going to mold into a style with preferences that Matt wants and expects.
This kind of thing is a two-way street. The candidate needs to understand what the head coach is looking for. But if the candidate has some special thoughts, it's an opportunity for him to sell his vision and how it would play in the B1G to his potential boss.
 
Before this season, I thought we'd be better off with a seasoned DC with strong B1G experience. So I was a little concerned with a highly successful DC--but one who'd done it at a lower level. Over the years, I'd seen a lot of HCs and coordinators crash and burn when they moved up to the Big Leagues, let alone the B1G.

But that's the beauty of interviews. Done well, they have the ability for a qualitied (but not necessarily a first choicer) to stand out from the crowd. Though skeptical, I came away from his first presser thinking, 'this guy feels like an up-and-comer' and 'If I was a star player, he's the kind of coach I'd want to play for.'

This kind of thing is a two-way street. The candidate needs to understand what the head coach is looking for. But if the candidate has some special thoughts, it's an opportunity for him to sell his vision and how it would play in the B1G to his potential boss.
Good points both.

As for being hesitant about the DC, that sounds like me. Add the fact that I was bullish on the offense, and you now know why no one calls me for advice. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc Fumble
Add the fact that I was bullish on the offense, and you now know why no one calls me for advice. ;)
Go back to preseason and I was blowharding in no uncertain terms that with a mobile QB and what we had this season, our PPG average would be jumping up to 28-30 points.

I've been wrong a lot over the years, but this one still mystifies me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redfred

Staff online

Members online