I've been a part of underperforming teams before. It was more about attitude rather than talent. Going into the season I really feared a 7-5 record based on known attitude issues with mainly Bo era players. And when a few of the key problem players were elected captains, it pretty much made me adamant that 7-5 was a high expectation. Low and behold they went 9-3. Now, did they go 9-3 because they overachieved? Or did they go 9-3 because the opponents underachieved?