Once in the title and three times in the story they refer to Smothers as a "star." When was he ever a star in Lincoln? Former athletes are often called "stars" when they pass as a way of paying homage to them but this is just silly. He transferred because he never played. How about we go with "Ex-Nebraska football player, who still shares QB duties, contributed in bowl game victory at Unknown U." Author had a axe to grind.
He threw an INT, so they put in the backup QB who played the hero.Once in the title and three times in the story they refer to Smothers as a "star." When was he ever a star in Lincoln? Former athletes are often called "stars" when they pass as a way of paying homage to them but this is just silly. He transferred because he never played. How about we go with "Ex-Nebraska football player, who still shares QB duties, contributed in bowl game victory at Unknown U." Author had a axe to grind.
In mop up duty against not very good competition. When he was a starter he wasnt overly good at passing.Smothers completions before our great OC Whipple or Whoopole or what ever last year was 69.6 pct and a QB rating of 144 pct. you might want to rethink what you typed.
Your point was that HH was the best passer after CT. When exactly did HH show his passing proficiency against decent competition?In mop up duty against not very good competition. When he was a starter he wasnt overly good at passing.
Like I said you might want read up on Smothers, he was much better than you suggestIn mop up duty against not very good competition. When he was a starter he wasnt overly good at passing.
He was up against Frost and Martinez regime at NU and Frost was not the guy we thought he was, neither was MartinezOnce in the title and three times in the story they refer to Smothers as a "star." When was he ever a star in Lincoln? Former athletes are often called "stars" when they pass as a way of paying homage to them but this is just silly. He transferred because he never played. How about we go with "Ex-Nebraska football player, who still shares QB duties, contributed in bowl game victory at Unknown U." Author had a axe to grind.
Like I said you might want read up on Smothers, he was much better than you suggest
I knew his time was up when we were up by 11 points against Northwestern and he decides to onside kick it. Dumbest decision he ever made but it was at that point it hit me that he maybe purposely trying to tank the season so he could get fired b4 the October 1st date to get his full $15k buyout.I always thought he deserved the full 5 years to get it turned around, but it was clear by the start of his 5th season we were going backwards. He never put a team on the field that looked prepared or tough.
I thought it was more like a addiction to gambling, you know like the guy who can’t leave the table until he has lost everything even when he gets up, he will take a unnecessary riskI knew his time was up when we were up by 11 points against Northwestern and he decides to onside kick it. Dumbest decision he ever made but it was at that point it hit me that he maybe purposely trying to tank the season so he could get fired b4 the October 1st date to get his full $15k buyout.
In last night’s Cotton Bowl, we witnessed the value of having a top-tier QB under center.FIRST THING to do to fix QB on this team
Waiting for OhioHusker's response in 5...4...3...In last night’s Cotton Bowl, we witnessed the value of having a top-tier QB under center.
With McCord, Ohio State was one of the best teams in the country. Without him, the Buckeyes’ offense did a great impression of this year’s Husker ball club.
If you dont have an excellent QB under center, there is no need to put a team on the field.In last night’s Cotton Bowl, we witnessed the value of having a top-tier QB under center.
With McCord, Ohio State was one of the best teams in the country. Without him, the Buckeyes’ offense did a great impression of this year’s Husker ball club.
If you dont have an excellent QB under center, there is no need to put a team on the field.
If you changed ‘excellent’ with ‘good, functional, or even adequate’, I’d be in agreement. An excellent qb is a huge asset, but imo, not absolutely essential to a very good team. I think we would be bowling with adequate qb play.If you dont have an excellent QB under center, there is no need to put a team on the field.
There are alot of variables with a QB that make a difference in a ball game, saw that last night in the OSU vs Missu game and the one with Oregon St and Notre Dame...I posted someplace in here that number priority to fix was QB and I stand by that. Getting those 2 frosh was a huge step, that offense should pick up 14 points or more average next yearIf you changed ‘excellent’ with ‘good, functional, or even adequate’, I’d be in agreement. An excellent qb is a huge asset, but imo, not absolutely essential to a very good team. I think we would be bowling with adequate qb play.
I’m very excited about Dylan and Danny, but very close behind is the O-line recruiting this staff has brought in.
That would be true if we were a 'one and done' quick-fix program and had to go out and find another kicker.Improved QB play would've won us a bunch more games. However having consistency in our FG game would've won us the Wisconsin and Iowa games. We'd be 7-5 had our kicker not missed a FG in our last 2 games. So the issues weren't strictly on the QB.
Alot goes into losing a game, just ask OSU gainst Missouri last night. Was it Henry who kicked that winning FG against CU from the 50 yd line? The most beautiful kick I ever sawImproved QB play would've won us a bunch more games. However having consistency in our FG game would've won us the Wisconsin and Iowa games. We'd be 7-5 had our kicker not missed a FG in our last 2 games. So the issues weren't strictly on the QB.
Thanks, val, I'll take any opportunity I can get to talk about it again.Was it Henry who kicked that winning FG against CU from the 50 yd line? The most beautiful kick I ever saw