I whole-heartedly agree. He's had 4 years and In all honesty we are no better off than we were before. How many of these "1 score" games should have been multiple scores and the dogs were called off, weak opponents, etc.it isn't about today or playing games close for moral victories. It's about 4 seasons with no winning seasons. Time to clean out the office and go be an offensive corodinator somewhere.
What does not get him fired next year in your mind when he comes back with the schedule they have? 6-6? 7-5? Will 5-7 with all close losses be ok?Meh. I think he needs and gets another year . I think he should get another year . Look at our schedule ( and try not to be all emotional) we played the hardest schedule in the country, and played it tough. Next season is not as bad, and next season should be the deciding season . Not many coaches have too face the kind of schedule we have had the last few years during a complete overhaul of the team, and to some degree the athletic department.
No bowl , no job. Just my opinionWhat does not get him fired next year in your mind when he comes back with the schedule they have? 6-6? 7-5? Will 5-7 with all close losses be ok?
That's my issue. I think we're so freaked out by the coaching carousel that we're willing to settle for less than mediocrity, all while trying to convince ourselves that we're making progress and next year, well that's going to be our year.What does not get him fired next year in your mind when he comes back with the schedule they have? 6-6? 7-5? Will 5-7 with all close losses be ok?
Well, no bowl for his 4th consecutive year. Enough time. Bring on the next coach.No bowl , no job. Just my opinion
We keep canning coaches and it ain’t worked, maybe give a younger head man the time to cut his teeth, worked for TomWell, no bowl for his 4th consecutive year. Enough time. Bring on the next coach.
no we shouldn't can him , in a rebuild because of this year's schedule.So..
We should keep a coach based on the ease of next year's schedule?
That's my issue. I think we're so freaked out by the coaching carousel that we're willing to settle for less than mediocrity, all while trying to convince ourselves that we're making progress and next year, well that's going to be our year.
Next year we may win 6, simply because our schedule is easier. I really don't think that the easier schedule will help, with Frost and AM2 tied at the hip. If Frost returns (God help us) and AM2 is his QB, I won't be surprised for 0-4 wins. I am totally and deadly serious here
Not buying the "easier schedule" rationale next year. On paper replacing OSU and MSU with Rutgers and Indiana makes for an easier sked, but does it matter? It's still a B1G schedule. I think next year sets up to be more disappointing than this. Nebraska doesn't lose games to the opposition. They lose games by a thousand self inflicted wounds every week. Whether its Illinois and Purdue or Oklahoma and OSU, Nebraska just keeps gashing themselves until they bleed out. This year Husker Nation is finding solace in playing Top 10 teams competitively. What comfort will there be next year when the Huskers punch themselves into submission against Indiana and Rutgers?So..
We should keep a coach based on the ease of next year's schedule?
He has to admit he has some bad coaches at the leastI hope he gets another year. But he has to take a long look at what and how he's doing things. Correct the problems and win 7 at least
Sure about that?He has to admit he has some bad coaches at the least
That’s not a fair comparison, and I assume you know it. Every season with SF at the helm was significantly worse than any season under TO.We keep canning coaches and it ain’t worked, maybe give a younger head man the time to cut his teeth, worked for Tom
worked for Tom